<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Kommentare zu: MomoFlow</title>
	<atom:link href="http://momolog.info/2009/11/28/momoflow/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://momolog.info/2009/11/28/momoflow/</link>
	<description>MoMolog aus Berlin stellt sich vor. Projekte, Ideen, Referenzen.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 06:42:25 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Von: aljoscha</title>
		<link>http://momolog.info/2009/11/28/momoflow/comment-page-1/#comment-527</link>
		<dc:creator>aljoscha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 06:42:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://momolog.info/?p=219#comment-527</guid>
		<description>Drawing the reflection (done once per image) is relatively cheap. Of course it also makes every image 50% bigger (for a reflection ratio of 0.5), resulting in slower rendering from then on. 
The more time consuming part is rendering the perspective, though. Every image has to be scaled/sliced 20-50 times for every angle.

There is an option to pre-render all angles for all images, resulting in 10-20 seconds initial waiting and smooth animation afterwards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Drawing the reflection (done once per image) is relatively cheap. Of course it also makes every image 50% bigger (for a reflection ratio of 0.5), resulting in slower rendering from then on.<br />
The more time consuming part is rendering the perspective, though. Every image has to be scaled/sliced 20-50 times for every angle.</p>
<p>There is an option to pre-render all angles for all images, resulting in 10-20 seconds initial waiting and smooth animation afterwards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Von: tim</title>
		<link>http://momolog.info/2009/11/28/momoflow/comment-page-1/#comment-525</link>
		<dc:creator>tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 22:42:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://momolog.info/?p=219#comment-525</guid>
		<description>after the first time every image is rendered once it is really smooth. Would it be faster without the shadow?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>after the first time every image is rendered once it is really smooth. Would it be faster without the shadow?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Von: Andy Dust</title>
		<link>http://momolog.info/2009/11/28/momoflow/comment-page-1/#comment-518</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Dust</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 19:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://momolog.info/?p=219#comment-518</guid>
		<description>Nice work.

It&#039;s a bit jerky though (firefox on ubuntu linux).

Would be nice if it &#039;flowed&#039; whilst dragging the slider handle as for larger sets I could image it might get difficult to navigate accurately, although I imagine this would effect performance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice work.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a bit jerky though (firefox on ubuntu linux).</p>
<p>Would be nice if it &#8216;flowed&#8217; whilst dragging the slider handle as for larger sets I could image it might get difficult to navigate accurately, although I imagine this would effect performance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Von: HCL</title>
		<link>http://momolog.info/2009/11/28/momoflow/comment-page-1/#comment-430</link>
		<dc:creator>HCL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 14:15:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://momolog.info/?p=219#comment-430</guid>
		<description>I checked again with safari and it feels better significantly…
still. 
a cute feature loosing its charme completely when viewed under not-so-perfect conditions (browser/ram that is.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I checked again with safari and it feels better significantly…<br />
still.<br />
a cute feature loosing its charme completely when viewed under not-so-perfect conditions (browser/ram that is.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Von: HCL</title>
		<link>http://momolog.info/2009/11/28/momoflow/comment-page-1/#comment-429</link>
		<dc:creator>HCL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 14:05:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://momolog.info/?p=219#comment-429</guid>
		<description>via @kosmar 

mmh. with a macbook (non-pro), firefox and PS open at the same time, it is not really smooth at all. 
the transitions are nice, but it misses any “snappyness”…
I should have a look on the YUI version, and I am shure it is worse. 
but I would not want to use it like that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>via @kosmar </p>
<p>mmh. with a macbook (non-pro), firefox and PS open at the same time, it is not really smooth at all.<br />
the transitions are nice, but it misses any “snappyness”…<br />
I should have a look on the YUI version, and I am shure it is worse.<br />
but I would not want to use it like that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
